17th European Patent Judges’ Symposium
| SHA-1: | bbb62ae2ca741a25681aee6891fd11a2b6c361a1 |
|---|
| Issue | Page(s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CONTENTS | View | ||
| The participants at the 17th European Patent Judges' Symposium | 1-3 | View | |
| OPENING OF THE SYMPOSIUM AND WELCOMING ADDRESSES | |||
| Ants KULL | 4-7 | View | |
| Wim VAN DER EIJK | 8-23 | View | |
| REPORT ON PROCEEDINGS | |||
| Stefan LUGINBÜHL | 24-41 | View | |
| WORKING SESSION | |||
| The Unified Patent Court | |||
Carl JOSEFSSON Preselection and training of UPC judges | 42-45 | View | |
Sir David KITCHIN Development of a common judicial culture and judgecraft among the judges of the UPC | 46-60 | View | |
Sir Richard ARNOLD A patent held in a binding ruling to have been infringed is subsequently revoked: what happens next? National practice and what will the UPC do? | 61-68 | View | |
Marie COURBOULAY Different practices at national courts: a challenge for the UPC | 69-72 | View | |
William CHANDLER Patentability of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs): state of play and developments | 73-79 | View | |
Klaus GRABINSKI Comparison and interaction between EPO boards of appeal and national courts – state of play in German practice | 80-95 | View | |
| Latest case law concerning supplementary protection certificates | |||
İlhami GÜNEŞ Supplementary protection certificates in EU law: a compensation mechanism and Turkey's position | 96-104 | View | |
Massimo SCUFFI Supplementary protection certificates: the evolution of European case law on the terms of patent extension and the scope of protection | 105-119 | View | |
Rian KALDEN Discussion of recent CJEU case law on SPCs: the three 12 December 2013 cases | 120-134 | View | |
| What amendments are permissible in order to be in line with the requirements under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? | |||
Fritz BLUMER What amendments are permissible in order to be in line with the requirements under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? | 135-144 | View | |
Klaus BACHER What amendments are admissible under Article 123(2) and (3) EPC? | 145-157 | View | |
| NATIONAL JUDGES' PRESENTATIONS | |||
| Recent developments in European and national patent law and case law | |||
CH Switzerland Dieter BRÄNDLE | 158-166 | View | |
DK Denmark Hans Christian THOMSEN | 167-169 | View | |
EPO European Patent Office Yvonne PODBIELSKI | 170-176 | View | |
FR France Sophie DARBOIS | 177-198 | View | |
GB United Kingdom Richard HACON | 199-210 | View | |
IT Italy Gabriella MUSCOLO | 211-222 | View | |
NL Netherlands Edger BRINKMAN | 223-228 | View | |
RO Romania Andreia Liana CONSTANDA | 229-243 | View | |
SE Sweden Peter STRÖMBERG | 244-246 | View | |
| LIST OF PARTICIPANTS | |||
| LIST OF PARTICIPANTS | 247-250 | View | |
| ANNEX | |||
| Case study "Extractor hood" | |||
|
Case study Contents | 251 | View | |
| Introduction – Case study: "Extractor hood" Dieter BRÄNDLE | 252-253 | View | |
| 1. Presentation of the case study | 254-255 | View | |
| 2. Statement of claim | 256-274 | View | |
| 3. Defence | 275-300 | View | |
| 4. Patent in suit - English translation of EP 1 234 567 B1 | 301-310 | View | |
| 5. Citation - English translation of EP 1 134 501 A1 | 311-325 | View | |
| 6. Questions | 326 | View | |
| 7. Patent legislation | 327-338 | View | |